While
every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this site, users
should be aware that due to circumstances beyond our control, it may be
necessary to change the text of documents posted here and therefore no
responsibility will be accepted by the Toronto Transit Commission for
discrepancies which may occur between documents contained on this site and the
formal hardcopy versions presented to the Commission.
If it is necessary to rely on the accuracy of Commission documents the Office
of the General Secretary should be contacted at 393-3698 to obtain a certified
copy. ONLY HARDCOPY RECORDS CERTIFIED BY THE GENERAL
SECRETARY WILL BE DEEMED TO BE OFFICIAL.
Form Revised: September 1999
TORONTO
TRANSIT COMMISSION
REPORT NO.
MEETING DATE: APRIL 6, 2005
SUBJECT: BICYCLE RACKS
ON TTC BUSES – PILOT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
It
is recommended that the Commission receive this report for information, noting
that a pilot project of bicycle racks on buses could be done in this way:
·
Buses on a limited number of bus routes would be
equipped with bicycle racks for a trial period; the most practical way of doing
this would be to select one garage and, at that garage, install bicycle racks
on specific buses which are already assigned to specific routes;
·
The routes recommended for a pilot project are these,
which operate out of Wilson Garage: 7 Bathurst,
29 Dufferin, 47 Lansdowne, 98 Willowdale-Senlac, 161 Rogers Rd, and 310 Bathurst;
·
98 Orion V and Orion VI buses are assigned to these
six routes for accessibility purposes, and 110 bicycle racks would be purchased
in order to equip these buses and allow for spare racks;
·
Funds in the order of $155,000 would have to be
allocated for this project; these funds are not included in the TTC’s 2005
budget;
·
The key tasks required to initiate this pilot project
would be purchasing the bicycle racks, installation, training of operators,
obtaining the Ministry of Transportation permits that are required for use of
bicycle racks on municipal buses in Ontario, and developing an
educational/promotional campaign for the public; and
·
The pilot project, if
approved, would start in late June or July, 2005.
FUNDING
The pilot project would require
an unbudgeted capital expenditure of up to $55,000 for purchase of the bicycle
racks (including a contingency for spare parts), and an unbudgeted operating
expenditure of up to $100,000 for installation, training, and marketing. There
is no provision for these expenses in the 2005 operating or capital budgets.
BACKGROUND
At
its meeting on November 17, 2004, the Commission, in discussing ways to
encourage cyclists to use the TTC, approved a motion, …” that TTC staff be requested to report back to the February 2005
meeting of the Commission, after consultation with the City of Toronto Cycling
Committee, on a Pilot Project for the installation of bike racks on a limited
number of bus routes with a report back to include:
-
operating issues and constraints;
-
supporting educational promotional campaigns;
-
capital and operating cost implications, including the
possibility of including bike racks as part of the capital plan and all new
RFP’s for buses”
This report responds to the
Commission’s request.
DISCUSSION
Cyclists
are now restricted from taking bicycles onto TTC vehicles during peak periods
when it is too crowded to carry large objects. At other times, bicycles are
allowed on transit vehicles if, in the judgement of the operator, there is
enough room.
Bicycle
racks can be mounted on the front of buses and can carry one or two bicycles
(see Exhibit 1). Bicycle racks would allow cyclists to take their bike with
them on a bus trip at any time and would make it more convenient to do so
because it is easier to load or unload a bicycle from a rack on the front of a
bus than to bring it into the bus and hold onto it for the duration of the
trip.
If a pilot project were to
proceed, the project would be limited to buses operating out of a single bus
garage to keep the cost reasonable and to ensure a timely implementation. Given
the logistical difficulty of assigning specific buses to specific routes, the
bicycle racks would be installed on the only type of buses which are currently
assigned to specific routes, those being accessible buses.
All of the accessible routes in
the system were reviewed and, in discussions with representatives of the
Toronto Cycling Committee, it was agreed that the accessible routes operating
out of Wilson Garage would be preferred for the pilot project. At Wilson
Garage, there are 98 accessible buses (Orion V’s and Orion VI’s) that are
assigned to the 7 Bathurst, 29 Dufferin,
47 Lansdowne, 98 Willowdale-Senlac, 161 Rogers Rd, and 310 Bathurst bus routes (see Exhibit
2). The advantages of these routes for this test are, among others, that they
include a route which goes as far south as the lake and one which travels from
downtown to the city limit (Steeles Avenue).
If
the pilot project proceeds, field tests would be done with a rack-equipped bus,
to review the conditions on each of the trial routes and to check that there
would be no problems in making turns, or entering/exiting on-street bus bays or
bus platforms within stations.
The review would assess any effects on garage
operations. Several potential garage issues have been identified by other
transit agencies, including possible damage to wash rack systems, and the
potential implications on garage capacity, because bicycle racks, even in the
stowed position, increase the effective length of a bus. These issues would be
resolved before the pilot project would begin.
A bicycle rack was purchased from
each of the two companies which manufacture them, in order to allow technical
testing of the racks.
A
competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued to 9 companies in addition
to an advertisement on the TTC’s website for 110 approved bicycle racks. The
RFP closed on February 11, 2005 and three proposals were received. The
commercial analysis recommends the award of the contract to Sportworks
Northwest Inc., on the basis of lowest proposal received (approximately
$45,000). If the Commission decides to proceed with the pilot project, the
purchase of these racks would be processed and the deliveries expedited.
Ministry
of Transportation (MTO) authorization is required for use of bicycle racks on
buses in Ontario. Staff would obtain the appropriate permits from MTO before
the pilot project.
Guidelines
would be developed related to the use of bicycle racks, and operation of a bus
equipped with a bicycle rack. A training program would be developed for all
operators at Wilson Division so that they would be familiar with operating a
bus with a bicycle rack, could answer customers’ questions about the use of the
racks, and could recognize when a customer has not loaded a bicycle properly.
Early
information from Phoenix had indicated average loading and unloading times of
50 to 90 seconds. However, more-recent Ottawa (OC Transpo) experience suggests
that loading and unloading times for current bicycle rack designs are much
shorter. OC Transpo reported that cyclists can usually load or unload bicycles
while other customers are boarding and alighting buses; that overall use of
bicycle racks is relatively low; and that use of bicycle racks does not
significantly affect route running times. TTC staff would assess the effects of
bicycle racks on the operation of the test routes.
An educational and promotional
campaign about the test routes and proper use of
the racks would be developed in co-operation with City Transportation and the
Toronto Cycling Committee. Such a campaign might
include the TTC web site, reference to the web site in What’s On, on-vehicle brochures (on affected buses), stop pole
cards (on affected routes), posters (at affected subway stations), advertisements
in the Metro newspaper, and a media
launch.
Based on the commercial analysis
of the proposals, the capital cost of the 110 bicycle racks, including a
contingency for spare parts, is estimated to be $55,000.
The estimated operating costs of
the pilot project is $100,000, which includes installation and maintenance of
the racks, training of all Wilson Division operators, the educational and
promotional campaign, and MTO permits.
There is no provision for bicycle
racks in the 2005 capital or operating budgets.
Customers’ use of bicycle racks on buses varies from
city to city, depending on year-round weather conditions, demographics,
topography, and associated bicycling infrastructure and facilities. Ottawa has
weather which is comparable to Toronto and has an extensive network of bicycle
routes. In Ottawa, OC Transpo found that, on their eight rack-equipped bus
routes, an average of 3 out of every 1,000 customers used the bicycle racks (approximately
3.5 customers per bus per day). The highest usage (5 out of 1,000 customers)
was on the high-speed, high-frequency bus routes that operate mostly on
Ottawa’s physically-separated and grade-separated transitways. Among the
regular, local mixed-traffic bus routes, the use of the racks was much lower: 1
out of every 1,000 customers. Due to a very small number of surveys returned
from users of the racks in Ottawa, it is not possible to accurately estimate
the number of new trips that were attracted to transit specifically by the
bicycle racks.
In the City of Toronto 1999 Cycling Study, 1001 telephone interviews
were conducted of Toronto residents. When asked which of 11 factors would
improve cycling in Toronto a great deal, "bicycle racks on city buses"
scored lowest of all the factors for recreational cyclists and second lowest
for utilitarian cyclists.
A
monitoring program would be developed to measure actual usage on the TTC. In
consultation and co-operation with the Toronto Cycling Committee and the City
of Toronto, surveys would be conducted to solicit feedback from customers and
to determine how many new transit trips could be attributed to bicycle racks on
buses.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
March 22, 2005
11-55-58
Attachments: Exhibits 1 and 2

